Evaluation of the Effect of Handling, Processing, and Storage Practices on the Quality of Honey Products from Selected Honey-producing Villages in Central Tanzania
Published: 01-03-2023
Page: 64-72
Issue: 2023 - Volume 2 [Issue 2]
Kachinde, Jumanne Lucas *
The Open University of Tanzania, P. O. Box-2924, 40000, Dodoma, Tanzania.
Leonard W. T. Fweja
The Open University of Tanzania, P. O. Box-23409, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Matobola Joel Mihale
The Open University of Tanzania, P. O. Box-23409, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
*Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Abstract
Aim: The objective of this study was to assess the effect of handling, processing, and storage practices on the quality of selected honey from selected honey-producing villages in Central Tanzania.
Material and Methods: A mixed methods approach was adopted for this study. Purposive and random sampling techniques were used to select a total of 106 participants. Both primary and secondary data were collected: primary data were collected through focus group discussions, interviews, questionnaires observation as well as actual honey sampling, while secondary data were collected through desk reviews. Multiple linear regression was performed to evaluate the effect of each practice (handling, processing and storage) on the quality of honey. The data were analysed using IBM Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 26 where descriptive and inferential statistics were used.
Results: A total of 109 respondents participated in the study, of which 49% (n = 52) were females. Age distribution of respondents was mainly dominated by age group 31 - 50 years, which occupied 66% (n = 67) followed by age group 51 - 60 years (25%, n = 29). Majority of respondents were primary school leavers (65% (n = 67) and only 5% (n = 7) were illiterate. Analysis of honey samples from the study location revealed that moisture content in honey varied from 19.5% in Aghondi, Manyoni to 19.9% in Kisaki, Singida (with a mean ± STD of 19.6 ± 0.2%). The moisture contents in the honey were similar to moisture content in honey from Egypt (19.7%). The pH varied from 3.5 in Aghondi, Amnyoni to 4.2 in Sajalanda, Itigi (with a mean ± STD of 3.9 ± 0.3). The pH values of honey in the study locations were relatively low compared to the pH of honey from Egypt (pH 4.3). HMF ranged from 9.6 mg/kg in Getruu, Itigi to 17.6 mg/kg in Kisaki, Singida (with a mean ± STD of 13.7 ± 3.3 mg/kg). The HMF in honey from all the locations were lower than the one from Egypt, which had 107.13 mg/kg, probably due to the difference in the geographical locations (tropical versus desert). Reducing sugars varied from 64.5% to 68.9% (with a mean ± STD of 66.4 ± 1.9%). The values were similar to the amount of reducing sugars in honey from Egypt. Multiple linear regression analysis has shown that moisture content, pH, HMF, and reducing sugars were dependent on the handling, processing and storage procedures of honey.
Contribution to Policy Implication: This study recommends interventions among farmers and beekeepers to ensure good hygienic handling, and storage practices. The findings demonstrates how the quality of honey is assured by adhering to technology, training, and skilful management of honey. This calls on policymakers to properly engage beekeepers and other stakeholders about a model that could be used to enhance pesticide regulation in Tanzania. This study calls for further research that would focus on findings ways for sustaining quality. Technically, farms hardly comply with government regulations, and the government lacks the know-how in terms of influencing beekeepers to stay away from the application of non-approved insecticides which has long-term implications for sustainability.
Keywords: Quality honey, handling procedures, processing procedures and storage procedures
How to Cite
Downloads
References
Luvanda FT, Lyimo EM. Evaluation of antimicrobial and antioxidant attributes of Tanzanian honey from two agroecological areas. Biofarmasi J Nat Prod Biochem. 2018;1(6):69-82.
Hungerford NL, Tinggi U, Tan BL, Farrell M, Fletcher MT. Natasha et al. Mineral and Trace Element Analysis of Australian/Queensland Apis mellifera Honey. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2020;17:6304.
Alavaisha V. Agricultural expansion impacts on wetland ecosystem services from Kilombero Valley, Tanzania. Doctoral Thesis, Edmond Alavaisha, Stockholm University; 2020.
Brina T, Halilevi L, Cyrk R. Assessment of Honey Quality from the Middle Podrinje Area, International Journal for Research in Applied Sciences and Biotechnology. 2021;(8):6-1.
Alqadhi M, Ahmad R. Honeybee pollination of important entomophilous crops, Pakistan Agricultural Research Council, Islamabad, Pakistan; 2016.
Irungu J, Suresh R, Torto B. Determination of Pesticide Residues in Honey: A Preliminary Study from two of Africa's Largest Honey Producers. International Journal of Food Contamination, Volume 3, Article Number. 2016;14:1-14.
Muli E, Kilonzo J, Dogley N, Monthy G, Kurgat J, Irungu J, Raina S. Detection of Pesticide Residues in Selected Honey of HoneyBee (Apis Mellifera L.) Colonies in a Preliminary Study from Seychelles Archipelago. Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 2018;101:451-457.
Kárpáti L, Csapó Z, Árváné GV. Current Situation and Development of The Bee-Keeping Sector in Hungary; 2006.
Souza TPA, Rocha Guidi L, De Abreu Glória MB, Fernandes C. Pesticides in honey: A review on chromatographic analytical methods. Talanta. 2016;149:124-141.
Gill RJ, Ramos-Rodriguez O, Raine NE. Combined pesticide exposure severely Affects individual- and colony-level traits in bees. Nature. 2012;491:105–8.
Bakan A. BaldaKristallennmeSorunu. Gida; 2002.
Maurya G. Apiculture 1. 4 Honey and their Uses. April.Mosha, H. J. (2006). The planning education system for excellence. Dar Es Salaam: E&D Limited; 2020.
József P, Károly P, János N. “Pesticide productivity and food security. A review,” Agron. Sustain. Dev. 2013;33:243–255.
Dutch P, Agri T. Cultivate delivers market insight into. Ecobichon, D.J. (2001). Pesticide uses in developing countries. Toxicology. 2016;160:27-33.
Ahmida M, Ahmida N, Elsharaa IAF. Physical Chemical Parameters and Phenolic Compounds Content Analysis of Different Imported Honey in Benghazi, Libya, Physical Chemical Parameters and Phenolic Compounds Content Analysis of Different Imported Honey in Benghazi, Libya; 2017.
Mwakatobe A, Mlingwa C. Tanzania-The status of Tanzanian honey Trade- Domestic and International Markets. 2001;0(27):1–13.
URT; 2007. inspection guideline_1.pdf.
Shimelis S. Survey of Honey Production System and Honey Bee Disease and Pests in Ejere District, West Shewa Zone, Oromia National Regional State, Ethiopia. A Thesis submitted to the College of Veterinary Medicine and Agriculture of Addis Ababa University in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Veterinary Epidemiology; 2017.
Lomiso DF, Nigussie G, Dessalegn E. Physicochemical Quality of Honey Samples Collected from Chena District, Southwestern Ethiopia. Journal of Food and Nutrition Sciences. 2021;9(5): 117-123. DOI: 10.11648/j.jfns.20210905.12